failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Neuroscience› Cognitive Neuroscience› Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Psycholinguistics — ERP effects on gender-marked Dutch articles (Otten & van Berkum 2009)

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Neuroscience › Cognitive NeuroscienceType: Couldn't replicate a published resultArea: psycholinguisticsArea: cognitive neuroscienceTarget: ERP effects on gender-marked Dutch articles (Otten & van Berkum 2009)Stage: replication

Hypothesis

ERPs on gender-marked Dutch articles would reflect whether the upcoming noun was predictable, as Otten and van Berkum (2009) reported.

What failed

A close replication with N = 58, nearly identical materials, procedure and analysis failed to replicate the original effect, though the pattern was consistent with the original data.

Broken assumption

Prediction of upcoming nouns reliably shows up in ERPs to the articles that precede them.

Why

The authors discuss methodological differences that could have contributed, and question whether Dutch gender-marked determiners are a suitable test case for lexical pre-activation.

From the published paper: Kochari et al. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 2018. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures (4)

Matched on shared genes, mechanisms and ways of failing as well as wording. Each shows why it matched — treat these as leads rather than verdicts.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.