Hypothesis
ERPs on gender-marked Dutch articles would reflect whether the upcoming noun was predictable, as Otten and van Berkum (2009) reported.
What failed
A close replication with N = 58, nearly identical materials, procedure and analysis failed to replicate the original effect, though the pattern was consistent with the original data.
Broken assumption
Prediction of upcoming nouns reliably shows up in ERPs to the articles that precede them.
Why
The authors discuss methodological differences that could have contributed, and question whether Dutch gender-marked determiners are a suitable test case for lexical pre-activation.
From the published paper: Kochari et al. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 2018. ↗CC BY