failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Social Sciences› Sociology and Political Science› Social and Intergroup Psychology

Social psychology — Resource-scarcity priming of racial categorisation (Rodeheffer et al. 2012, Study 1)

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political ScienceType: Couldn't replicate a published resultArea: social psychologyTarget: Resource-scarcity priming of racial categorisation (Rodeheffer et al. 2012, Study 1)Stage: replication

Hypothesis

Priming resource scarcity would make East Asian participants more likely to judge ambiguous East/South Asian faces as out-group members, as scarcity priming did for White participants judging White/Black faces.

What failed

In a preregistered conceptual replication in Japan (N = 769, power 0.79 for d = 0.2), the pattern matched the original but the priming effect was not significant (d = 0.1).

Broken assumption

Resource-scarcity priming shifts racial categorisation of ambiguous faces in a substantial way across cultures.

Why

The abstract reports the null and says reasons are discussed, without stating one; it also differed from the original in population and in the faces used.

From the published paper: Takebe et al. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 2023. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures (4)

Matched on shared genes, mechanisms and ways of failing as well as wording. Each shows why it matched — treat these as leads rather than verdicts.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.