failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Social Sciences› Sociology and Political Science› Psychology of Social Influence

Social psychology — Spatial distance priming

Submitted 2026-10-23

Field: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political ScienceType: Couldn't replicate a published resultArea: social psychologyTarget: Spatial distance primingStage: replication

Hypothesis

Plotting two points far apart on graph paper would make people feel less close to their family and change their calorie estimates, as Williams and Bargh (2008) reported.

What failed

Direct replications of both experiments, with experimenters who did not know each participant's condition, showed no sign of either priming effect.

Broken assumption

A brief cue of physical distance changes how close people feel to others.

Why

The abstract does not give a cause. The replications added blinding of the experimenter, which the originals may have lacked.

From the published paper: Pashler et al. PLoS ONE, 2012. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures (4)

Matched on shared genes, mechanisms and ways of failing as well as wording. Each shows why it matched — treat these as leads rather than verdicts.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.