failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Health Professions› Health Information Management› Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Digital mental health — Machine-learning dropout prediction on small datasets

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Health Professions › Health Information ManagementType: A method hit a wallArea: digital mental healthTarget: Machine-learning dropout prediction on small datasetsStage: full study

Hypothesis

Machine-learning models trained on the small datasets typical of digital mental-health studies give trustworthy estimates of how well dropout can be predicted.

What failed

Learning curves on 3,654 users of one digital intervention showed that datasets of N ≤ 300 overestimated predictive power; for uninformative features, in-sample performance even fell as datasets grew, and sophisticated models overfitted small samples. Overfitting eased at N = 500, but performance did not converge until N = 750–1,500.

Broken assumption

Prediction performance measured on a few hundred users is a reliable estimate of real predictive power.

Why

The paper attributes the inflated estimates to overfitting in small samples, especially with complex models, and proposes minimum dataset sizes of N = 500–1,000.

From the published paper: Zantvoort et al. npj Digital Medicine, 2024. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures (1)

Matched on shared genes, mechanisms and ways of failing as well as wording. Each shows why it matched — treat these as leads rather than verdicts.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.