failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Agricultural and Biological Sciences› Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics› Plant and animal studies

Crop pollination — Supplementing pumpkin fields with managed honey bee or bumble bee hives

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsType: No effect foundArea: crop pollinationTarget: Supplementing pumpkin fields with managed honey bee or bumble bee hivesStage: full study

Hypothesis

Adding managed Apis mellifera or Bombus impatiens hives to pumpkin fields would raise bee visits to flowers and fruit yield beyond what wild bees provide.

What failed

In a two-year comparison of fields supplemented with honey bee hives, bumble bee hives, or nothing, neither kind of supplementation increased visitation by those bees or pumpkin yield.

Broken assumption

Placing managed hives next to a crop increases pollination of that crop above the wild-bee baseline.

Why

Yield did rise with visits by honey bees and bumble bees across all fields, so the bees matter as pollinators; adding hives simply did not raise their visit rate, and wild bees such as Peponapis pruinosa were also prominent visitors.

From the published paper: Petersen et al. PLoS ONE, 2013. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.