failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology› Clinical Biochemistry› Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Microbiology methods — SYTO9 / propidium iodide live–dead viability staining

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical BiochemistryType: A method hit a wallArea: microbiology methodsTarget: SYTO9 / propidium iodide live–dead viability stainingStage: full study

Hypothesis

SYTO9 and propidium iodide staining, read in microtiter plates, gives an accurate high-throughput measure of live versus dead bacteria.

What failed

With SYTO9 alone, live and dead Staphylococcus aureus gave equal signal, and dead Pseudomonas aeruginosa gave an 18-fold stronger signal than live cells — still stronger after PI counterstaining. SYTO9 bleached strongly over time, and PI's maximum signal was weak relative to SYTO9 and background.

Broken assumption

SYTO9 stains live and dead cells equally, so the SYTO9/PI ratio reads out viability.

Why

The authors attribute the errors to SYTO9 bleaching, its different binding to live and dead cells, and background fluorescence, which make small inaccuracies in the weak PI signal change the outcome.

From the published paper: Stiefel et al. BMC Microbiology, 2015. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.