failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Environmental Science› Global and Planetary Change› Marine and fisheries research

Fisheries science — Otolith chemistry of skipjack tuna nursery areas

Submitted 2026-10-23

Field: Environmental Science › Global and Planetary ChangeType: A method hit a wallArea: fisheries scienceTarget: Otolith chemistry of skipjack tuna nursery areasStage: full study

Hypothesis

The chemistry of ear bones (otoliths) in young skipjack tuna would differ enough between the three main Indian Ocean nursery areas to tell where an unknown fish was born.

What failed

Some single elements differed between nurseries, but the overall chemical signatures largely overlapped. The best classifier assigned fish to the correct nursery only 51% of the time, and the Central and Eastern nurseries were hard to separate.

Broken assumption

Otolith chemistry is distinct enough between Indian Ocean nursery areas to identify the birthplace of skipjack tuna.

Why

The nursery signatures overlap, and the signatures also changed between the 2018 and 2019 cohorts, which makes a fixed reference signature unreliable.

From the published paper: Artetxe-Arrate et al. PLoS ONE, 2021. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.