failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Neuroscience› Cognitive Neuroscience› Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Consciousness science and psychophysics — Unconscious perception of visually masked stimuli

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Neuroscience › Cognitive NeuroscienceType: No effect foundArea: consciousness science and psychophysicsTarget: Unconscious perception of visually masked stimuliStage: full study

Hypothesis

For weak, briefly presented and masked stimuli, humans can discriminate above chance without any awareness of them.

What failed

Using a bias-free procedure for measuring subjective confidence, the study found no evidence of unconscious perception: participants’ behaviour matched a Bayesian ideal observer even though the stimuli were visually masked, implying the thresholds for subjective awareness and objective discrimination are effectively the same.

Broken assumption

Above-chance discrimination of masked stimuli can happen without conscious experience.

Why

The authors argue the apparent dissociation in earlier work came from biased measures of subjective awareness, and report an online survey in which most experts acknowledge the lack of convincing evidence while continuing to hold the belief.

From the published paper: Peters et al. eLife, 2015. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.