failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Mathematics› Statistics and Probability› Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Numerical cognition — Attentional SNARC effect (Fischer, Castel, Dodd & Pratt 2003)

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Mathematics › Statistics and ProbabilityType: Couldn't replicate a published resultArea: numerical cognitionTarget: Attentional SNARC effect (Fischer, Castel, Dodd & Pratt 2003)Stage: replication

Hypothesis

Seeing a small number would speed detection of left-side targets and a large number right-side targets, as Fischer et al. (2003, Experiment 2) reported.

What failed

In a registered replication with 1,105 participants at 17 labs and four interstimulus intervals, the effect was in the original direction only half the time (proportion .50); effects within and across labs were minuscule and incompatible with the original. Finger counting, reading direction, handedness and maths fluency or anxiety did not moderate it.

Broken assumption

Merely seeing a number shifts spatial attention along a mental number line.

Why

The authors conclude the effect failed to replicate and cannot support strong claims about a link between number and space.

From the published paper: Colling et al. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2020. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures (1)

Matched on shared genes, mechanisms and ways of failing as well as wording. Each shows why it matched — treat these as leads rather than verdicts.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.