failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Earth and Planetary Sciences› Atmospheric Science› Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Air quality modelling — CMAQ v5.0 dust and trace-metal estimates

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric ScienceType: A method hit a wallArea: air quality modellingTarget: CMAQ v5.0 dust and trace-metal estimatesStage: full study

Hypothesis

CMAQ v5.0's new dust tracking and wind-blown-dust parameterisation would reproduce observed soil and trace-metal concentrations across the continental United States.

What failed

Simulating all of 2006 against surface networks, the model was acceptable in the western US (mean bias about ±0.5 μg/m³) but consistently overestimated soil concentrations in the eastern US (0.5–1.5 μg/m³) in every season, and badly overestimated some urban trace metals — Al by 380%, Ti 370%, Si 470% in the autumn.

Broken assumption

Adding element tracking and a wind-blown-dust scheme is enough to make modelled dust and trace metals match observations.

Why

Underestimated night-time mixing in urban areas appears to contribute. Removing anthropogenic fugitive dust emissions and wind-blown dust lowered concentrations but did not remove the overestimate, so the authors conclude other errors remain in the system.

From the published paper: Appel et al. Geoscientific model development, 2013. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.