failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Medicine› Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine› Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Non-small cell lung cancer — Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus avelumab (anti-PD-L1)

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineType: An approach that didn't workArea: non-small cell lung cancerTarget: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus avelumab (anti-PD-L1)Stage: phase 2

Hypothesis

Adding avelumab to three cycles of neoadjuvant platinum chemotherapy would produce enough radiologic responses in resectable stage IB–IIIA NSCLC to justify a full phase 2 study.

What failed

Of 15 patients in stage 1, four had a radiologic response (one complete), fewer than the six required to continue, so the study was terminated. The regimen was tolerable (26.7% grade III/IV toxicity) without extra surgical complications.

Broken assumption

The response gains from adding checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC carry over to the neoadjuvant setting.

Why

The paper reports only that adding immunotherapy did not appear to raise the response rate in this setting, and so the study failed its primary endpoint.

From the published paper: Tfayli et al. Cancer Medicine, 2020. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.