failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Agricultural and Biological Sciences› Plant Science› Urban Agriculture and Sustainability

Food security and development studies — Urban and peri-urban agriculture as a household livelihood strategy

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant ScienceType: No effect foundArea: food security and development studiesTarget: Urban and peri-urban agriculture as a household livelihood strategyStage: full study

Hypothesis

Households practising urban or peri-urban agriculture are more food secure than households that do not.

What failed

Among 208 stratified-sampled households in Tongaat, 54% of practising households consumed more than six food groups against 40% of non-practising ones, but a Mann-Whitney test found no significant difference in dietary diversity between the two groups (U = 5292, p = 0.808). Employment status, arable land access, tenure and household income were the variables significantly associated with food security.

Broken assumption

Growing food at home measurably improves a household’s dietary diversity.

Why

The authors report the difference in proportions descriptively and offer no explanation for the non-significant comparison.

From the published paper: Khumalo et al. Sustainability, 2019. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.