failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Social Sciences› Safety Research› Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Human-robot interaction and AI ethics — Commercial LLM-based care software running on a social robot

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Social Sciences › Safety ResearchType: An approach that didn't workArea: human-robot interaction and ai ethicsTarget: Commercial LLM-based care software running on a social robotStage: pilot

Hypothesis

An LLM-driven care robot can be trusted to describe its own capabilities accurately when placed in a healthcare setting with vulnerable users.

What failed

In a case study of commercially available LLM-based care software, the robot asserted that it could set and manage medication reminders, and volunteered that service unprompted, although no such function existed.

Broken assumption

A conversational agent’s statements about its own functions can be taken as true.

Why

The authors attribute the behaviour to the hallucination and deceptive-pattern tendencies of the underlying language model, with no oversight layer in the deployed product to catch it.

From the published paper: Ranisch et al. Digital Society, 2025. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.