failed_experiment.db
← Back to browse

Agricultural and Biological Sciences› Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics› Bat Biology and Ecology Studies

Urban wildlife ecology — Bat boxes as supplementary roosts

Submitted 2026-10-22

Field: Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsType: No effect foundArea: urban wildlife ecologyTarget: Bat boxes as supplementary roostsStage: full study

Hypothesis

Because one generalist species (Gould's wattled bat) dominates bat-box use, installing boxes would shift local bat communities towards lower diversity.

What failed

A five-year before-after control-impact experiment at 18 sites in south-eastern Australia, using 9,035 bat-detector nights, found little difference in community composition, diversity or species activity between sites with existing boxes, newly added boxes or no boxes.

Broken assumption

Who uses an artificial roost dictates the composition of the surrounding bat community.

Why

The generalist kept dominating the boxes themselves, but that did not translate into a community-level change over the short-to-medium term studied.

From the published paper: Griffiths et al. Scientific Reports, 2020. ↗CC BY

Research ideas from this failure

Unvetted lead — read the papers

New hypotheses this failure suggests, each with a crucial experiment, a rival explanation of the original result, and the papers it rests on. Written by AI from paper titles and abstracts found on OpenAlex (and Europe PMC, for life and health sciences).

Related failures

Nothing else logged looks close to this one yet.

Links in published research

Where this experiment's genes are known to matter outside its own research area, and the papers behind those links. Sources: Open Targets Platform and Europe PMC.